wrong tool

You are finite. Zathras is finite. This is wrong tool.

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Powered by Genesis

Valuation is irrelevant, pay attention to the terms

April 5, 2015 by kostadis roussos 4 Comments

One of my friends who happens to be way more plugged into the start up scene than I am, has been telling me for months to ignore valuation, but focus on term sheets.

A public company’s valuation is based on a simple formula  # of shares * share price. Any owner of shares can get a return on his investment if the company pays a dividend or if the share value appreciates. Pretty simple. The price of the share is decided every day in the market based on public data. Price goes up, you make money, price goes down you lose money.

A privately held company’s valuation is determined as a result of the negotiation between the investors and the owners of the company.

Part of the negotiation is what happens when the company gets sold or gets liquidated.

And this is the important bit. Something I have been ignoring.

Consider a company X that recently got 116 million dollars at a 2.76 billion dollar valuation. If the company gets sold to another company for a 116 million dollars a naive engineer like myself would do the following math:

.116 / 2.76 = % of company owned = approximately 4%

investors get back 116 *.04 = 4 million dollars

Investors lose 112 million dollars.

Except they didn’t. They lost 0 dollars.

Because the Term Sheet basically said that the first 116 million dollars goes to the investors. And after that 116 million do other people get money.

This makes the investment feel risk free because folks are assuming that in the worst case the company will not be worth less than 116 million dollars. The upside may be limited because the company has to be worth more than 2.76 billion but the downside feels manageable.

The risk free nature of these investments may explain why investors are willing to pile onto a firm like Company X. With downside limited, and a possible massive upside who wouldn’t want to get into the action?

 

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Jobs

Comments

  1. Alan Yoder says

    April 5, 2015 at 9:17 pm

    I believe that is the common case, yes. It is also why engineers that work their butts off at these companies often wind up with very little from their pile of stock; they’re not the investors listed on the terms sheet..

    Reply
    • kostadis roussos says

      April 6, 2015 at 12:21 am

      The increasing banality of these terms are going to make things painful for employees who don’t see an IPO

      Reply
  2. Faisal says

    April 5, 2015 at 10:37 pm

    Worth a read: http://www.feld.com/archives/2004/08/to-participate-or-not-participating-preferences.html

    Reply
    • kostadis roussos says

      April 6, 2015 at 12:19 am

      Thanks! The terms are everything and most of us are unaware of them

      Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d